Monday, April 29, 2019

After charges, Liberation Way to close its doors

Posted April 14, 2019

Tessa had no doubt her test results were wrong. She had stopped drinking weeks before starting alcohol addiction treatment at Liberation Way, an outpatient center a few miles from her home in Newtown Township.
Liberation Way Yardley office
But every time Tessa was pulled out of therapy at the Yardley treatment center to give a urine sample, the results came back positive for alcohol byproducts.
Those tests ended up costing her $2,500 in insurance copays, something she said Liberation Way assured her wouldn’t happen.
Then one day, a staff member took her into a room to explain that since she kept failing urine tests, she would be moved into an inpatient program at an affiliated sober living home.
Tessa had enough. She bolted out the back door and never looked back.
Nothing about the treatment she received made sense to her, Tessa said — until last month.
That’s when criminal charges were filed against 11 people and nine businesses in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, following an 18-month grand jury investigation into Liberation Way. Prosecutors allege the for-profit drug and alcohol treatment business exploited people with addictions through ineffective treatment and unnecessary testing, and defrauded private insurers out of more than $100 million. On Friday, Life of Purpose, which absorbed Liberation Way’s operations late last year, said it was preparing to close its treatment programs in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Florida, after the private equity firm that owns it decided to cut loose its drug and alcohol treatment holdings.
“It all makes sense now,” said Tessa, who has been sober for a year. She asked that her last name not be used. “It was a scam.”
But red flags involving Liberation Way and its questionable practices appeared on the state radar long before the arrests late last month.
In the first two years it was open, the number of licensing violations at the Yardley center doubled from seven to 16, according to online records. Instead of penalizing the company for noncompliance, the Pennsylvania Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs, known as DDAP, allowed it to expand. The company also opened affiliated sober living homes in Pennsylvania, where such homes are unregulated, and in New Jersey, where they must be licensed as a boarding house. A state database there has no records of Liberation Way as a license holder.
Pennsylvania records show that after Liberation Way expanded operations, the total number of licensing violationsnearly doubled from 50 to 93 between 2017 and 2018, state inspection records show. So did gross revenues, from nearly $11 million to $23 million, according to one company founder.
State records also show DDAP did not take formal action against licenses for Liberation Way until March 2018, months after it had forwarded concerns to the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office, which opened its investigation.
The company’s ability to circumvent state and federal drug treatment regulations for so long without consequences did not surprise health care fraud experts.
The lingering opiate and opioid epidemic and emerging methamphetamine resurgence has created increased public demand for drug testing and treatment options. But the state agencies charged with licensing those programs often are working with limited resources and authority over licensed program providersaccording to experts.
The situation has created a perfect storm for unscrupulous operators looking to cash in, they said.
“Drug treatment has always been an issue with fraud. It’s the nature of addiction treatment that it is challenging, from a regulations point of view,” said Lou Saccoccio, executive director of the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association in Washington, D.C. “A lot of this is check-the-box kind of things. They have this number of counselors. They seem to have the required training. Here is our treatment plan. But it’s a piece of paper. Is anyone actually doing that? You almost have to have people on-site constantly to monitor.”
Violations road map
DDAP assumed drug and alcohol treatment licensing from the Pennsylvania Department of Health in 2012. Since then, the number of licenses it has issued jumped 45 percent, from 570 to 824. Thirty percent of that growth occurred between 2015 and last year, the same time frame in which Liberation Way operated, according to state data.
About a year after opening its Yardley outpatient center in 2015, Liberation Way added two Montgomery County locations and five more outpatient program licenses, including drug detoxification.
Liberation Way Flourtown recovery home
The first hint of problems surfaced during the first routine license renewal inspection at the Yardley house in February 2016. Inspectors found seven more patients enrolled than the center’s license allowed.
Eight months later, DDAP heard clients were being required to live in affiliated sober living homes in Montgomery County as part of their treatment, although the company was licensed only as an outpatient center.
In response to the citations, Liberation Way submitted plans to correct the violations. But it’s unclear if DDAP consistently followed up to ensure compliance before subsequent inspections.
In November 2017, DDAP ordered Liberation Way to immediately stop “unauthorized and unpermitted” maintenance activities involving buprenorphine “out of concern for the safety of your patients” at its outpatient centers, records show. Buprenorphine, which includes Suboxone, is a narcotic used in the treatment of opiate disorders.
During an inspection the following month, however, Fort Washington staff provided DDAP with charts identified as current “maintenance” patients at the Yardley location, and couldn’t provide “accurate and updated” medication logs for their own location, according to records. DDAP cited 18 violations there, including one in which the center failed to notify DDAP and local law enforcement about a theft of methadone that occurred in July, four months after DDAP approved the outpatient detox program, records show.
Another three months passed before DDAP ordered the immediate closing of new admissions to the Fort Washington outpatient center, as detailed in a March 22, 2018, letter to now former Liberation Way CEO Jason Gerner and CFO Branden Coluccio. The agency also ordered the Fort Washington and Yardley centers to reduce the total number of patients from 20 to five and 105 to 25, respectively.
Gerner, of Shamong, New Jersey, and Coluccio, of Doylestown Township — who are among those charged in the insurance fraud investigation — were again told to immediately discontinue “use of any authorized treatment activities in each respective location to ensure client safety.”
“The actions of Liberation Way have violated state and federal regulations which compromised patients’ safety and confidentiality,” wrote Wenona Wake, a former manager of DDAP’s Bureau of Quality Assurance for Prevention and Treatment.
But online inspection records show when DDAP returned to Fort Washington weeks later, it found staff were still providing Suboxone to clients, although its federal certification as an opioid treatment program had expired. The center also ignored directives to obtain state Department of Health licensing to perform urine and blood screening and testing at the center.
An April 2018 inspection also noted a “repeat citation” after the center failed to notify DDAP after three clients overdosed off-site using methadone stolen from the center, an incident that resulted in police presence there.
DDAP approved yet another plan of correction, which was virtually identical to one approved in December 2017, according to records.
Limited authority
While it is responsible for drug and alcohol program oversight, the only leverage DDAP has to force compliance with state regulations is the ability to reduce or pull licenses. But it’s a tool the agency rarely uses.
DDAP has never permanently revoked a license, nor does it track how often it issues more limited provisional licenses, according to spokeswoman Rachel Kostelac. The agency has no standards for when a provisional license is triggered, either; decisions are at the agency’s discretion, Kostelac said.
An estimated 10 to 20 provisional licenses are active at any given time during the year, Kostelac said. No Bucks or Montgomery county programs currently are operating on provisional licenses, according to a review of online inspections.
While the number of licenses has increased in recent years, the number of inspectors, known as “licensing specialists,” remains at 19, a roughly 1:43 ratio of inspectors to licenses.
Such limited authority is why some fraud experts are skeptical that states can provide effective monitoring of drug testing and treatment without necessary resources, enforcement triggers and progressive penalties. Unscrupulous operators know where regulatory weak spots exist and how to exploit them, experts said.
Meanwhile, government and the insurance industry have only recently started to compile data on the depth and breadth of scams, said James Quiggle, a spokesman for the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud.
The biggest areas of fraud in addiction treatment involve drug testing, sober living homes and outpatient services, which are often cross-owned and cross-managed, allowing for the “inbreeding of referrals,” Quiggle said.
“Policymakers need to wake up to the severity of the problem. More people, more corruption, creates more money and attracts more scammers,” he said. “Until fraud investigators wrap their arms around these crimes and enact resources that take out the legal rewards and insert unsustainable risk, the system cannot begin to clean itself up.”
State regulators also may be reluctant to limit or close programs at a time when the public is demanding greater access to drug and alcohol treatment, said Carla Jackie Sampson, associate director of health care management programs at Temple University’s Fox School of Business.
She added that the way the health care industry reimburses for services, based on numbers and volume instead of patient outcomes, encourages health care fraud, especially where there is weak regulatory checks and balances.
“We just are going to check a box that services were delivered and the money will flow,” Sampson said. “If they can continue to operate, if you have nothing that follows up, the money will just walk out the door and we won’t get it back.”
New start and ending
CEO Drew Rothermel
Two months after DDAP halted patient admissions at Fort Washington, it lifted the ban, but downgraded Liberation Way’s full license to a provisional one.
Patient capacity was capped at eight for detox activities and 10 each for outpatient programs. No action was taken against licenses for Yardley or another center in Bala Cynwyd.
The orders were outlined in a June 8, 2018, letter to Andrew Rothermel, who replaced Gerner as CEO of Liberation Way the previous month. Before he took over at Liberation Way, Rothermel was CEO of Life of Purpose, which operates outpatient drug and alcohol treatment programs in New Jersey and Florida that specialize in treating young adults.
The decision to oust Gerner was made by Fulcrum Equity Partners, a private Atlanta firm that had purchased majority interest in Liberation Way in December 2017 for a reported $40 million.
Fulcrum has denied the company was aware of any of Liberation Way’s questionable activities or practices before acquiring it, and has cooperated with state and federal fraud investigators.
In a recent phone interview, Rothermel said the management team at Liberation Way misled him about the seriousness of the violations. It wasn’t until he met with state regulators that he learned the extent of the issues and how little was done to fix them, he said.
The Fort Washington center had its full license and capacity reinstated in September, the same month Fulcrum Equity announced it was adding Life of Purpose to its substance abuse treatment holdings. In November, Fulcrum changed the name of the centers from Liberation Way to Life of Purpose.
But a new name and new licenses could not fix past damage.
Late Friday, Rothermel confirmed that Life of Purpose and its holding company, City Line Behavioral Health LLC, had closed new patient admissions. He said they will begin shuttering their Pennsylvania, Florida and New Jersey outpatient programs, a loss of 120 treatment slots. Employees learned of the pending closure in an email Friday.
The “size and scope” of the alleged fraud and the legal uncertainty involving the criminal charges led Fulcrum Equity to decide that it is not a good business decision to invest in drug and alcohol treatment program and it is removing those companies from its holdings, Rothermel said.
Center employees will now focus on finding new placements for patients and ensure continuity of care, before surrendering its licenses to DDAP, Rothermel said.
Future plans remain uncertain, including whether the company will consider filing for bankruptcy protection and reorganize, Rothermel said.
One thing he was certain about was the continued need for accessible and affordable drug treatment.
“Very proud of the work this team was doing,” he said.

Risoldi enters Bucks County jail to serve contempt sentence

Posted April 11, 2019

A politically prominent Buckingham socialite awaiting sentencing in a multimillion-dollar insurance fraud case turned herself into authorities this week to serve a 30-day sentence for contempt, nearly three years after a judge ordered she serve jail time for violating a court order.
Claire Risoldi at her 2019 fraud trial
Claire Risoldi, 71, entered Bucks County Correctional Center on Tuesday to start her sentence, Bucks County spokesman Larry King confirmed Thursday. Risoldi is being housed in general population in the women’s wing of the prison.
This is the second time that Risoldi has been incarcerated in Bucks County prison; the first occurred in 2016 when she was jailed for five days after she was arrested on witness intimidation charges, which eventually were dropped.
Risoldi surrendered to authorities two weeks after losing her final appeal to have the contempt finding thrown out. A U.S. District Court judge last month denied her petition to overturn the contempt finding, which was upheld on appeal in state court.
Chester County Senior Judge Thomas Gavin, who oversaw the fraud case after all Bucks County judges recused themselves, held Risoldi in contempt in June 2016 for using the subpoena process to skirt a court order barring her from contacting prosecution witnesses in her insurance fraud case.
Risoldi is scheduled to be sentenced next month for filing nearly $13 million in false insurance claims following a 2013 fire at her family’s former estate, Clairemont. A jury convicted her of dealing in unlawful proceeds, insurance fraud, theft by deception and criminal attempted theft by deception and conspiracy. The conviction was her second involving insurance fraud. In 1990 she pleaded guilty in federal court to mail fraud charges for defrauding her first husband’s union health insurance provider of $13,028.
The fire-damaged 10-acre property is scheduled to be auctioned to the highest bidder later this month; it was surrendered to the state as part of the restitution order that was part of a plea agreement with Carl Risoldi, 46, of Buckingham, Claire Risoldi’s son who was also charged in the insurance fraud case. Carl Risoldi pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of theft by deception and attempted theft by deception and was sentenced to four years of probation.

Records: New Hope officers had lapsed Taser training at time of police-involved shooting

Posted April 16, 2019
A veteran New Hope police officer who shot and wounded a Pipersville man after confusing his stun gun with his Glock 22, had not been re-certified in the use of his police-issued Taser since at least 2016, according to a review of records obtained by this news organization.
Brian Riling (left) at moment he is shot on March 3, 2019
Cpl. Matt Zimmerman, 65, who retired April 10, also was not the only department officer without a current Taser certification, which goes against a 2007 internal policy and the device manufacturer’s recommendations.
The New Hope police officer responsible for the department’s re-training has an instructor certification that expired last year.
Nine of the 10 other officers employed by the borough at the time of the March 3 shooting also had not been re-certified in Taser use since at least 2016, according to records obtained through a Right to Know request. The lone exception was an officer who obtained his Taser certification in 2017, but was not re-certified last year, as the weapon manufacturer and department policy requires.
The revelation is the latest raising questions about the department practices since the Bucks County District Attorney’s Office released its determination on April 12 that Zimmerman, a 33-year member of the police force, was not justified, but “excused” when he shot and seriously wounded assault suspect Brian Riling during an altercation in the police station’s holding cell.
District Attorney Matt Weintraub found Zimmerman’s conduct was not criminal because of his “honest but mistaken” belief that he drew his stun gun during what was an intense, evolving altercation. Riling survived the single shot to his abdomen, but he was hospitalized in critical condition for several days and has experienced complications, according to his criminal attorney.
Weintraub confirmed that Zimmerman’s Taser certification was outdated and the officer wore the Taser on the same side as his service weapon, another violation of the department’s Taser policy. Zimmerman also was standing closer than three feet when he fired his weapon, the minimum distance from a subject an officer must maintain before using the Taser, according to department policy.
Under the department’s Taser policy, officers that carry or use the Taser X26 are required to complete a training program that includes written and practical tests, and undergo a “mandatory” re-certification course each year. The model has been described as the most powerful stun gun, posing a higher cardiac risk than other models, according to a 2017 Reuters investigation.
The 10 officers were re-certified on Taser use on March 29, four weeks after the shooting. Also certified on March 29 was the department’s newest officer hire, who was sworn in April 17.
Taser certificate forms are missing for Zimmerman, who was put on paid administrative leave after the shooting, as well as Chief Michael Cummings and Officer Richard Joyner, the department’s internal firearms and Taser instructor. The records request sought training completion and re-certification documents for the years 2016 through this year. This news organization has filed a second Right to Know request for the same records for 2007 through 2015.
According to the department policy, the X26 trainer is to document and maintain all training records and forward copies to the chief of police to be placed in each officer’s training file.
It is unknown if any disciplinary action has been taken against Cummings or any officers as a result of the lapsed recertification.
Cummings, who is first vice president of the Police Chiefs’ Association of Bucks County, has referred all questions about the shooting and police policies to Montgomery County civil attorney Christopher Boyle, who has said he cannot comment citing “pending litigation.” As of Friday neither Riling or his civil attorney Susan Lin had filed notices of litigation in Bucks County Common Pleas or U.S. District Court.
Records show that Joyner obtained his certification as a “Taser Instructor re-certification” in November 2016, according to a certificate issued by the Bucks County Police Training Center.
Joyner was listed as the certifying instructor on the only 2017 officer Taser certification form prior to March 29 provided to this news organization. He was not the certifying officer on the most recent certificates.
Taser instructor certification is valid for two years from the date it is certified, according to the manufacturer, AXON, formerly known as Taser International. Once an instructor is expired, Axon permits a one-year grace period past that expiration date to register and attend a court as re-certifying.
“Once your certification has expired, you are not to conduct or certify anyone as a TASER CEW (Conducted Energy Weapon) User,” according to the company’s website.
New Hope Mayor Larry Keller, who oversees the police department, confirmed Thursday that Joyner is employed as a police officer. Keller also confirmed Joyner is the officer responsible for firearms and Taser training and his duties include keeping track of officer training completion, but he declined comment on the lapsed Taser certifications.
Cummings will lead an internal review of the shooting that will include officer use of force, weapon and Taser training and policies, according to Keller.
This news organization was unsuccessful in immediately reaching borough council President Connie Gering for comment Friday.

A 12-minute uncut surveillance video the DA’s office released last week shows the events leading up to, and after, the shooting. In the video Riling enters the holding cell and removes his belt at the direction of an unidentified officer. After removing his belt, a white packet falls to the cell floor and Riling steps on it. The unidentified officer attempts to move Riling off the packet, which Riling is heard denying is his in the video.
A struggle between with the first officer ensues and Riling retrieves the packet and throws it into the cell toilet. Roughly one minute and 30 seconds into the video, Zimmerman enters the cell to assist the officer, who is attempting to subdue Riling on a bench in the cell. About 10 seconds after entering the cell, Zimmerman, his service firearm in his hand, yells “Taser” and fires one shot into Riling’s torso.
After shooting Riling, both officers moved out of view of the camera. Eight minutes pass before an ambulance arrives. An unidentified officer appears to try and keep Riling calm, but no officers appear to provide him First-Aid.
Zimmerman was among the three police officers who arrested Riling earlier in the evening after he harassed, threatened and assaulted his estranged girlfriend in a confrontation outside the New Hope restaurant where she works, according to court documents. Riling also had an active arrest warrant on charges of burglary and harassment stemming from a February incident with the same woman where he allegedly broke into her home using a crowbar.
Riling was apprehended while he was waiting in his vehicle parked in the complex where the woman lives, according to court documents. He is awaiting a preliminary hearing schedule for next month on charges including witness intimidation and retaliation against a witness, both felonies, and misdemeanor charges of stalking, simple assault and harassment and driving with a DUI-suspended license.

Former New Hope police officer involved in shooting identified

Posted April 17, 2019

The New Hope Police Department will perform an internal review, including officer weapons training and certifications records, after a veteran police officer mistook his service weapon for his stun gun during a holding cell altercation that left a Pipersville man seriously wounded last month.
New Hope Chief Michael Cummings
New Hope Mayor Larry Keller, who oversees the police department, identified the officer who fired the shot as Cpl. Matt Zimmerman, a 33-year veteran of the 11-officer New Hope Police Department and the department’s most senior officer underneath the police chief. Zimmerman was placed on paid administrative leave following the shooting, and submitted paperwork seeking immediate retirement on April 10.
The mayor described the review, which he anticipated would be done by Police Chief Michael Cummings, as the next step following the April 12 release of Bucks County District Attorney Matt Weintraub’s determination that found Zimmerman not justified, but excused, in the March 3 police-involved shooting of Brian Riling. Keller did not know if the borough investigation results would be released to the public.
Earlier this week Cummings referred all questions about the shooting to Montgomery County attorney Christopher Boyle, who declined to answer questions about the department’s policies and training practices citing the department as being “currently in litigation.”
Keller confirmed that Zimmerman did not take his mandatory annual recertification Taser training last year, though he did not know if other officers also had outdated training. Under the department’s Taser policy, adopted in 2007, officers that carry the TaserX26 are required to undergo annual retraining and re-certification.
New Hope Police Department uses an internal officer as its firearms and Taser instructor, Keller said. He declined to identify the officer with that responsibility, but acknowledged the person would be responsible for keeping track of officer training completions and certifications.
Weintraub also has acknowledged that Zimmerman did not follow department policy regarding Taser use. He wore the device on the same side as his service weapon, in violation of the policy, but his conduct could be excused from criminal prosecution because of his “honest but mistaken” belief he was deploying his Taser at the time he fired at Riling, who was struck in the abdomen.

The 38-year-old Riling survived, but he has experienced ongoing medical complications as a result of it, according to his criminal defense attorney, Richard Fink. Riling has obtained a separate civil attorney, though no civil litigation had been filed as of Wednesday in Bucks County or U.S. District courts.
Keller described Zimmerman as a “terrific officer” and a “good guy.” During the last 21 years he has served as mayor, Keller said Zimmerman accumulated many letters of accommodations and, to his knowledge, no serious infractions requiring disciplinary action that he would be notified about.
“If he had any infractions, they had to be very, very minor and I was not privy to it,” Keller said.
Weintraub also mentioned Zimmerman’s exemplary record, with “relatively few minor historical infractions,” as playing a role in the shooting determination.
Keller said that he had seen the roughly 12-minute uncut raw surveillance video of the shooting, which the District Attorney’s Office released.
“I was certainly as surprised as anyone else would be who saw the video,” Keller said. “Clearly, at least to me, it was human error. Everything all happened very quickly.”
The video, which this news organization viewed, shows Riling entering the holding cell and removing his belt at the direction of an unidentified officer. After removing his belt, a white packet falls to the cell floor and Riling steps on it. The unidentified officer attempts to move Riling off the packet, which Riling is heard denying is his in the video.
A struggle between with the first officer ensues and Riling retrieves the packet and throws it into the cell toilet. Roughly one minute and 30 seconds into the video, Zimmerman enters the cell to assist the officer, who is attempting to subdue Riling on a bench in the cell. About 10 seconds after entering the cell, Zimmerman, his service firearm in his hand, yells “Taser” and fires one shot into Riling’s torso.
Zimmerman was among the three police officers who arrested Riling earlier in the evening after he allegedly harassed, threatened and assaulted his estranged girlfriend in a confrontation outside the New Hope restaurant where she works, according to court documents. Riling also had an active arrest warrant on charges of burglary and harassment stemming from a February incident with the same woman where he allegedly broke into her home using a crowbar.
Riling was apprehended while he allegedly was waiting in his vehicle parked in the complex where the woman lives, according to court documents. He is charged with witness intimidation and retaliation against a witness, both felonies, and misdemeanor charges of stalking, simple assault and harassment and driving with a DUI-suspended license.
Zimmerman was aware of these two incidents involving Riling before the holding cell incident, and he had personally heard threats of violence made by Riling during a phone call between Riling and his estranged girlfriend, Weintraub said.

Bucks DA: New Hope police-involved shooting not justified, but excused

Posted April 12, 2019
Brian Riling (left) at moment he was shot on March 3, 2019

The New Hope police officer who shot and seriously wounded a Pipersville man after he grabbed his service weapon instead of his stun gun during an altercation inside a holding cell did not have mandatory up-to-date Taser training, according to the Bucks County District Attorney’s Office, which on Friday released its finding the shooting was not justified, but “excused.”
Bucks County District Attorney Matt Weintraub confirmed the outdated training detail, which goes against the New Hope Police Department’s Taser policy, a copy of which was obtained by this news organization.
In a news release announcing his decision, Weintraub added the investigation led by Bucks County detectives also found the officer wore his Taser on the right side, in front of his firearm, which also goes against the police department’s policy. The policy states officers should wear their Tasers on their non-dominant side, in what is known as a cross-draw position.
“This violation of policy, however, does not constitute a violation of law,” Weintraub wrote.
New Hope police Chief Michael Cummings did not response to an email and phone message left for him Friday seeking comment.
Pennsylvania law excuses the shooting officer’s conduct from criminal prosecution because of his “honest but mistaken” belief he was deploying his Taser at the time he fired one shot that struck Brian Riling, 38, in the abdomen on March 3, Weintraub wrote.
Riling survived the shooting, but he has experienced ongoing medical complications as a result of it, according to his criminal defense attorney, Richard Fink.
In the release, Weintraub said the officer would have been justified in using his Taser to regain control of Riling, “as the officer had a reasonable belief the scuffle posed a danger to his fellow officer.” But the use of a firearm must be an officer’s last resort and it was not justified in this case, he added.
But since the officer believe he was deploying his Taser, “not wielding his service firearm,” he did not possess the criminal mental state required to be guilty of a crime under state law, according to Weintraub.
“The state crimes code states a person has a defense to a criminal charge if he makes a mistake for which there is a reasonable explanation or excuse,” Weintraub wrote.
Weintraub declined to release or confirm the identity of the officer, citing his office’s policy not to identify individuals who are not charged with crimes. Attorney William Goldman, who is representing the officer, also declined to confirm his name, but said his client worked for decades on the borough force and he was not asked to retire.

Weintraub made available an uncut, roughly 12-minute surveillance video of the shooting incident with the news release. The video, which depicts the altercation, does not show the full faces of the two officers involved.
Court documents filed in Riling’s March 3 arrest identified New Hope police Cpl. Dawn Haas, Cpl. Matt Zimmerman and Officer Justin Hagan as responding to an assault report and subsequent arrest, but do not include any details of the shooting. It is not known if either Hagan or Zimmerman are the male officers seen in the video from inside the borough police department’s holding cell.

The shooting officer, who was placed on paid administrative leave following the shooting, submitted paperwork seeking immediate retirement three days before the Bucks County District Attorney’s Office issued its determination, according to the DA release and confirmed by Goldman.
In the release, Weintraub said his investigation included extensive review of police reports and video footage, interviews with involved parties, and the examination of the circumstances surrounding Riling’s detention and arrest the night of the shooting.
New Hope police arrested Riling earlier in the evening after he allegedly harassed, threatened and assaulted his estranged girlfriend in a confrontation outside the New Hope restaurant where she works, according to court documents. Riling also had an active arrest warrant on charges of burglary and harassment stemming from a February incident with the same woman.
Riling was apprehended while he was allegedly waiting in his vehicle parked in the complex where the woman lives, according to court documents. He is charged with witness intimidation and retaliation against a witness, both felonies, and misdemeanor charges of stalking, simple assault and harassment and driving with a DUI-suspended license. His preliminary hearing on those charges is scheduled for Monday.
The officer who shot Riling was aware of these two incidents involving Riling before the holding cell incident, and had personally heard threats of violence made by Riling during a phone call between Riling and his estranged girlfriend, Weintraub said, adding they “illustrate the mindset of the officer” who shot Riling.
Goldman echoed the district attorney’s assessment.
“Police officers are called upon to make split-second decisions and with this, it was in defense of a fellow officer with a large man ... who had professed he was not going back to prison, announced he would kill himself, and was fighting with an officer in a jail cell. This man had committed burglary with a crowbar, he assaulted (the estranged girlfriend) he stalked her, he instructed her to lie, he resisted arrest,” Goldman said. “It’s important to know the events that led up to this incident. Really important.”
The video of the altercation and shooting, which this news organization viewed, shows Riling entering the holding cell and removing his belt at the direction of one of the officers. After removing his belt, an unidentified white packet falls to the cell floor and Riling steps on it. The unidentified officer attempts to move Riling, who is described as a “fit” 6-foot-4-inch construction worker, off the packet, which Riling is heard denying is his in the video.
A struggle between with the first officer ensues and Riling retrieves the packet and throws it into the cell toilet. Roughly one minute and 30 seconds into the video, the second unidentified officer enters the cell to assist his fellow officer, who is attempting to subdue Riling on a bench in the cell. Approximately 10 seconds later, the second officer, his service firearm in his hand, shoots Riling in the torso after yelling “Taser.”
“In reviewing the totality of the circumstances, Weintraub also considered the officer’s decades of exemplary service to the citizens of New Hope as evidenced by dozens of commendations and letters, as compared to relatively few minor historical infractions on his service record,” the release said. Weintraub declined to describe the type of infractions on the officer’s record.
Bucks DA Matt Weintraub
Friday’s announcement capped nearly six weeks of mystery surrounding the shooting. The District Attorney’s Office had declined to provide basic details that are typically released days after a police-involved shooting including where it happened, circumstances surrounding the shooting, and the victim’s identity or an update of his condition. This news organization obtained those details and others after obtaining court documents and filing Right to Know requests.
It is the first time in recent memory where the district attorney has not deemed a police-involved shooting justified. Since 2009, at least 12 police-involved shootings have occurred in Bucks County, including one in 2012 in New Hope that left a man paralyzed
In the earlier shooting, police contended Steven Cabelus was shot after he answered the door to his apartment with a gun in his hand when police attempted to serve an involuntary mental health commitment warrant on him. The DA’s subsequent investigation found Cabelus pointed the gun at officers, refused to drop the gun and appeared to be moving toward them, prompting an officer to shoot him.
The DA did not pursue criminal charges against Cabelus, according to a search of online court records. Cabelus also denied the police and DA version of the shooting in a 2014 federal civil suit he filed against the borough, four police officers, and Cummings. In his suit, Cabelus claimed police never announced themselves when they knocked on his door and when he saw the officers he dropped his gun before the officers fired.
New Hope Borough paid Cabelus $500,000 as part of a 2015 settlement agreement that released the officers from the suit, according to documents obtained through a Right to Know request.