Monday, March 30, 2015

County detectives: Illegal Lower Bucks sports betting ring busted

Posted: Saturday, March 14, 2015

To the alleged bookies he was just another customer: A Bristol resident and businessman who liked betting on football games.
But the man — known only as CI#1 — was not just another gambler. He was also working with Bucks County authorities investigating a suspected illegal betting operation that had been around at least seven years.
The two-year probe resulted in the arrest Friday of Ralph “Sharky” Sabatini, 77, of Bristol, and his alleged bookmaking partner Valerio “Val” Ungarini, 56, of Bristol Township, who are charged with running a telephone-based sports gambling operation.
Sabatini and Ungarini were arraigned before District Judge Leonard Brown on eight felony and 10 misdemeanor charges including corrupt organizations, dealing in unlawful proceeds, criminal use of a communication facility and engaging in bookmaking. Both men were released on $100,000 unsecured bail.
Bucks County Detectives started looking at the pair in 2012 after “cooperating individuals” came forward and claimed Sabatini — the uncle of Bristol Mayor Pat Sabatini — and Ungarini were running an illegal gambling business out of the basement of Ungarini’s home.
Court documents do not identify the two main confidential informants beyond describing the Bristol man as an “established businessman” with no criminal record and a second person as a Bucks resident who has provided information on illegal gambling to the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office.
In a meeting with Detective David Hanks in August 2012, CI#1 claimed that he started placing bets with the pair around the 2012 Super Bowl, after not placing a “personal bet” with them for several years, according to the 65-page probable cause affidavit.
The Bristol man told authorities that gamblers called in wagers on a specific phone number — and the bets were audio recorded in case there are disputes, the affidavit said.
The pair took bets for all sporting event, but mainly football games, the source told the detective. Gamblers were told to place wagers 30 minutes before the start of any sport event, authorities said.
Sabatini is the one who doled out winnings, authorities said. He’d call on Tuesdays, tell how much the person won, and the bettor picked up the winnings. Ungarini handled the losers. He called between Tuesday and Thursday with the bad news about what they owed.
Tuesdays were the day when Sabatini and Ungarini met to do their books and “settle up” with gamblers.
The agents, people who placed third-party bets, were paid a 30 percent commission on a losing bet. Sabatini and Ungarini would take a “vig” — the bookmaker’s fee — but court documents don’t detail what the cut was.
After receiving information about the gambling operation, authorities set up surveillance on the men’s homes during the start of the 2012 football season and noted a “pattern” of behavior that confirmed informant’s information including details like Sabatini arrived at Ungarini’s house prior to kickoff times of NFL games and left after kickoff.
The informant whom investigators used placed bets on NFL games through Sabatini and Ungarini in 2012, starting with the second or third week of the regular season. At that point, he was losing $2,000 to $4,000 but by the ninth regular week of NFL play — around December — he was ahead $25,000 to $30,000, according to court documents.
Following the end of the regular 2012 NFL season the investigation went inactive until the next football season, when the confidential informants confirmed the gambling operation was still in business, authorities said.
County detectives set up surveillance of the men’s homes again and observed the same pattern of behavior between the men during the NFL season. The Bristol man told authorities in November 2013 he was still placing bets with the men and he won more than $1,000.
In September 2013, Hanks spoke with CI#1 who said within the last three weeks he had placed three to four wagers on football games; during October and November he spoke with authorities and stated he was still placing bets on NFL games with the men and he won more than $1,000, police said.
In addition to the confidential informants, police obtained phone records for Sabatini and Ungarini that showed the majority of calls placed to the phone number where bets were placed occurred on days when college and NFL games were played, according to court records.
County detectives also conducted extensive surveillance at the men’s homes from 2012 through 2014 during the football season. Detectives also obtained a court order to wiretap a phone line used to place bets in January 2014.
The calls where audio was recorded had Ungarini either talking about bets on NFL games, discussing information related to gambling and betting, or talking to Sabatini regarding the bets of others, the affidavit said.
The day after the 2014 NFL Super Bowl, authorities executed search warrants at the homes of Sabatini and Ungarini. Authorities recovered computers, recorded messages of individuals playing bets, cash and bookmaking materials including a list of individuals with accounts in the operation, the affidavit said.
When they went to serve the warrants, investigators found Sabatini at Ungarini’s house. He claimed he was there to “feed the birds,” the affidavit said.
But detectives confiscated a single sheet of paper he had with him. Written on it were two two distinct columns: one headed “P.O.” – which stands for payoff; the other was headed “Collect.”
The paper also contained names. The people who bet on the previous night’s Super Bowl along with the amount of money they owed – or were owed, court documents said.

Monday, March 9, 2015

Pennsylvania contractor-law regulations fall short, say critics

Posted: Monday, March 9, 2015

Part Two


Larry Lukas expected to spend $14,600 for a new roof and a remodeled basement. Instead, he paid $10,000 for bare walls and faced nearly a year of frustration.

He complained to authorities after contractor Charles Gorman abandoned the job at his family’s Southampton home in 2013, but didn't hear back for four months. That's when he was contacted by a police detective who was building a case against Charles R. Gorman Custom Carpentry, of Horsham.
At that point, authorities believed Gorman had ripped off five others.
By the time criminal charges for home improvement-related theft were filed against Gorman in July 2014,there were eight victims. After he was arrested two more homeowners came forward with theft allegations.
Gorman is awaiting sentencing in the Court of Common Pleas in Bucks County. He admitted accepting more than $36,000 from 10 homeowners in exchange for shoddy or incomplete work.
His legal problems aren't over. He's facing trial for the same crime in Carbon County, according to court records.
“Had any of these agencies done anything about this crime other victims may have been saved from losing their money,” Lukas said. “But because nothing happened, Mr. Gorman was allowed to continue to commit the crime of home improvement fraud.”
The Lukas family’s slow road to justice is one reason why some people believe the Pennsylvania Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act doesn’t go far enough to regulate the industry, despite recent tweaks designed to address a few shortfalls such as outdated contractor information in registrations.
The frequent complaints among victims include the difficulty in bringing fraud allegations to the attention of authorities, the snail's pace of investigations that allow contractors to keep working and hiding assets, and no mechanism for a timely restitution.
Charles Gorman
Charles Gorman
The home improvement trade association doesn’t like the law much either. It wants to see education, training and experience made standard before someone can obtain a contractor registration. It wants money collected through registration fees used to enforce the law, rather than fill state budget gaps.
For ripped-off homeowners like Lukas, cases may appear open and shut. But such investigations are among the most tedious and time consuming, law enforcement and consumer advocates said.
“I sure understand this can be a terribly frustrating problem to residents who have been burnt by contractors,” Bucks County Director of Consumer Protection Michael Bannon said. “I can see in their eyes the pain that they feel and I’m sympathetic to them.”
The case against Gorman started with a homeowner's claim that Gorman took deposit money did not work, said Southampton Detective James Schirmer, who conducted the investigation. Soon, Schirmer found other victims with similar claims.
Gorman's victims stretched from Jim Thorpe to Delaware County, he said, adding he had to contact a lot of people and some turned out not to be viable criminal cases. Each potential victim had to provide copies of relevant documents, but sometimes victims don’t have all the necessary information readily available, leading to delays, he added.
Search warrants had to be obtained for bank records to prove the money came out of the victims’ accounts, he said. Finally, the district attorney had to screen the cases to make sure they are chargeable.
The fact that Gorman kept deposit money from several people but performed no work helped strengthen other victims' cases, including Lukas'. It showed a pattern of intent to defraud, Schirmer said.
“Many of Gorman’s victims had filed civil suits in various district courts and had been awarded judgments,” he added. “However, with Gorman’s lack of assets, the civil judgment was as worthless as the contract he gave them.”
Commonwealth Court judges can — and do — require defendants make restitution as part of a sentence and typically extend probation until restitution is fulfilled. Judges also will require a defendant to stick to a repayment plan under threat of violating probation.
But since 2003, only five of at least 20 contractors sentenced in Bucks and Montgomery counties for theft or fraud fully paid restitution orders, according to court records. Most who owe are required to pay less than $500 each month.
One former Northampton contractor convicted in 2005, who received probation, has repaid less than $90,000 of the more than $200,000 in restitution the court ordered. The repaid amount includes $38,000 he paid the day he was sentenced, according to the court records.
Lower Makefield contractor John Succi, convicted last year in the largest contractor fraud case in recent Bucks County history, started ripping off people in 2005. Half of the 14 people he allegedly bilked were victimized before the 2009 law took effect, authorities say.
When customers sued Succi, he filed for bankruptcy protection, which consumer advocates say is a common way contractors avoid paying restitution or civil awards. He changed the name of his company at least nine times to further avoid collection efforts, authorities said.
Nearly a decade after his deception began, Succi was convicted in December of 27 counts of home improvement-related fraud and theft for stealing $2.5 million. His sentence: 15 to 30 years in a state prison. And he was ordered to pay more than $1.8 million in restitution.
IGNORANCE NOT BLISS
Bannon is blunt with his opinion of how Pennsylvania stacks up among others when it comes to protecting consumers from home improvement fraud.
“For a major Northeast state we are behind,” he said. “I would say our law is not as strong as I would like.”
Other states require home improvement contractors pass a competency test, set standards for maintaining licensing requirements, and mandatory ongoing training, he said.
Michael Bannon
The linchpin that resulted in Pennsylvania’s home improvement contractor law was the one New Jersey put in place in 2005, Bannon said. New Jersey’s law drove unscrupulous contractors across the Delaware River and into Pennsylvania. Bannon’s office saw a spike in complaints involving New Jersey contractors but found tracking down alleged fly-by-night contractors was like chasing ghosts.
“We didn’t know who anyone was,” Bannon said.
In addition to establishing minimum insurance coverage and mandatory registration, Pennsylvania's law requires contractors provide their registration numbers in advertisements and contracts and mandates new contract terms such as a start and completion date, total cost of the project and the exact work to be done.
While the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office oversees its enforcement, the law limits its power to pursuing only civil actions, such as fines or restitution agreements, against noncompliant contractors. Criminal prosecutions are handled at the county level.
Last year the AG’s Office doubled the number of legal actions taken against noncompliant contractors. But the number — 31 versus 12 in 2013 — still represents a tiny portion of the complaints, which totaled nearly 3,000 last year. A typical legal action starts with two to eight complaints, but often grows as the investigation progresses, according to the AG’s office.
The state agency has the power to deactivate contractor registrations, something it has done more than 4,600 times since 2009 with one third of those deactivations since 2012 alone, according to the office.
In August, the AG's Office took action against eight home improvement contractors, securing five “assurances of voluntary compliance” and three court orders requiring contractors to pay more than $130,400 in restitution and civil penalties, according to a press release. None of the contractors were located in Bucks or Montgomery counties, the AG's Office said.
The contractors were accused of violations from failure to maintain current registration and failure to use contracts that follow the law, to failure to restrict customer deposits to one-third the total price and failure to provide consumers with a three-day cancellation notice, according to the AG.
An attorney general spokesman said the office mediates every complaint against a home improvement contractor for a material, substantive or contractual violation of duty.
"We will attempt to get some sort of relief for every consumer who may have been victimized by a contractor, even on a single incident," spokeswoman Carolyn Myers said.
Consumer advocates attribute the recent enforcement crackdown to the appointment of Basil Merenda as director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection in April. Among Merenda’s first acts was to start a new regulatory compliance unit, hire more agents and attorneys to investigate complaints and conduct spot audits of registrations for accuracy.
In October, for the first time since 2009, several new pieces of legislation were signed into Pennsylvania law designed to address some loopholes, including one that now gives contractors 30 days to update any changes in registration information, including phone numbers, addresses, or insurance coverage or face fines.
Another change allows so-called “time and materials” contracts, previously banned under the law but still widely used. The new option set a 10 percent ceiling above the initial cost estimate for those using the contracts, and a homeowner must agree to any costs beyond the ceiling in a written change order.
The change was pushed by the home improvement industry, which said it will be helpful with smaller projects and emergency repairs.
State Rep. Thomas Killion, who represents Delaware and Chester counties and authored the updates, believes the time and materials option provided a need for flexibility in the law since contractors can run into unforeseen circumstances with a project.
Killion nailed a change involving the Mechanic’s Lien Law, which will create in the near future an online system so property owners can identify all subcontractors working on projects and avoid double billing. The change will enable a property owner to make sure subcontractors are paid before making a final payment to the general contractor, avoiding potential liens filed against them. The same systems exist in other states such as Ohio and Michigan.
One bill that never made it out of the state Senate Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure Committee would have established a restricted revenue account into which all fees, penalties and interest would be deposited and solely appropriated to the AG’s Office to administer and enforce the contractor law. Contractors are required to pay a $51 registration fee every two years.
Consumer advocates and the 5,400-member Pennsylvania Builders Association believe the AG’s lax enforcement of the law has been a direct result of a lack of funding.
The AG’s Office has no control over money collected under the contractor law. Until 2011, the state Legislature funneled all the money into the general fund to fill budget gaps. But since a 2011 amendment to the law, the AG’s Office can request an annual allocation, though the request is not automatically granted, according to the AG’s Office.
A little more than $5 million of the nearly $11 million in fees collected since 2009 was used to fund the state budget, the attorney general spokesman said. But since the change, the AG’s Office has received $4 million, he said.
“It’s a cash cow for them,” said George W. Edwards, a Chester County contractor and member of the National Association of the Remodeling Industry. “It should go toward enforcement and educating the public in what their rights are and what they expect.”
RIPE FOR RESHAPING
Fran Cleaver who, until recently, headed the Senate Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure Committee, believes lawmakers are open to more changes
John Salvatico in 2013
“There needs to be a very hard look done at this,” Cleaver said. “It’s ripe for that type of debate and reshaping.”
Bucks County prosecutor Marc Furber, chief of economic crimes for the District Attorney’s Office, would like to see more front-end background checks before a registration is issued to a contractor and mandatory reviews of an applicant with theft or fraud convictions.
“Obviously we don’t want people who have theft convictions,” he said. “That person certainly shouldn’t be immediately getting their registration.”
Bannon would like to see an amendment that would keep contractors with multiple civil judgments off the registration list. He’d also like to see criminal penalties for contractors caught working without a registration and requirements that contractors be bonded.
Municipal building and inspection offices should be required to check contractor registrations and insurance coverage before issuing building permits, Bannon said.
“That is a basic common sense thing to me,” he added.
Warminster resident Jeff Goldstein, a victim of a contractor, believes the recent updates are a step in the right direction, but he wants to see more done to compensate victims. He suggested bringing in forensic accountants to review assets of convicted contractors who claim they are bankrupt or appear to have no assets and requiring contractors to take out bonds for projects.
“If they would have stopped John (Succi, the contractor) earlier, he wouldn’t have done that last job in 2013,” Goldstein added. “He could have been put out of business by then.”
Along with changes in the law and enforcement, Bannon would like to see the state do more to increase public awareness and education about the contractor law and its registry. It’s something he hasn’t seen happen since the law took effect.
“The education on this issue needs to be ongoing because consumers may not be interested in the subject unless they're doing a home improvement project themselves,” Bannon said. “Many people say on a regular basis, ‘I didn’t know there was a registration.'”
Bannon isn’t the only one whose noticed the lack of knowledge about the law.
Before the 2009 law required a one-page addendum to contracts informing customers they have three days to cancel, most didn’t know about the option, though the right has been in place since the 1950s, said Edwards, the Chester County contractor.
“Unless you tell them, they have no clue,” Edwards said. “Unless you are upfront — this is who I am, this is my license, my certifications, here is my insurance — they have no clue."
Jo Ciavaglia: 215-949-4181; email: jciavaglia@calkins.com; Twitter: @jociavaglia






A look at some fraudulent contractor cases since 2009
Artur Wryzkowski, of Newtown Township, pleaded guilty in the Court of Common Pleas in Bucks County to taking $3,120 to fix a roof on a Lower Makefield home in 2011, but never doing the work. He did business under the company named Quality #1 Roofing in Newtown. He was sentenced in 2013 to three years of probation and fully repaid his restitution order at the time of his guilty plea.
In 2010, he pleaded guilty to theft by deception and receiving advance payment for services and failing to perform. He was sentenced to one year of probation. He repaid the $7,500 before his guilty plea in that case. According to online court records, he had two civil judgments against him in 2009 totaling $8,675.
Steven Dunner, who owned Doylestown Roofing & Siding, was convicted of home improvement-related fraud in 2011, but managed to obtain a state registration.
In his application, Dunner lied about his previous criminal convictions including the 2011 contractor fraud-related case. After his second conviction in 2012 for stealing more than $28,000 from three Bucks County homeowners, a court order was issued to keep Dunner off the state registry.
Dunner was sentenced to two to 10 years in state prison and appealed. He lost the appeal in November 2013 and disappeared while out on $100,000 unsecured bail. He remains at large. He made almost full restitution at the time of his guilty pleas in both home improvement fraud cases.
John Debrigida was a Warminster contractor convicted of ripping off two Montgomery County homeowners for $10,000 in 2011. His company — Outdoor Dream Spaces — was not state-registered, something that consumer protection advocates consider a bright red flag.
But his name appeared on the state registry, under a company called Dream Scapes, until 2013, a year after he pleaded guilty to home improvement fraud and bad checks. In that registration, Debrigida claimed he had never been successfully sued in civil court within the last decade for home improvement work. But court records tell a different story.
Debrigida or Outdoor Dream Spaces were successfully sued five times between 2008 and 2010 for a combined total of $27,325, according to online court records.
A Montgomery County judge sentenced Debrigida to five years of probation and ordered him to repay $16,156, including money he owed a supply company. But two years later, he still owes just less than $14,000, according to court records.
John Salvatico, of Doylestown, also continued working in home improvement after his a conviction in 2008 for deceptive business practices related to a family contracting business. Salvatico and his brother Joseph pleaded guilty or no contest in Bucks County in 2008 to bilking six homeowners and were each sentenced to 11½ to 23 months of jail time and 10 years of probation.
In 2013, Salvatico was accused of fraud, theft, deceitful business practices, forgery and related offenses in at least four towns in Bucks and Montgomery counties. In at least one of the cases, officials said, Salvatico told the homeowner and township that his name was John Farabella.
After those charges were filed, Salvatico worked for Eastern Construction & Roofing LLC, a registered state contractor. His wife, Virginia Schaffer, was listed on the registry as the company’s owner.
Salvatico eventually pleaded no contest in Bucks County to numerous felony theft charges. As part of a plea agreement, he was sentenced to two to four years in a state prison plus 10 years of probation. The judge also issued a court order banning Salvatico from working in any aspect of construction and added another $10,523 to his 2008 restitution total.
Salvatico still owes much of the $81,000 in restitution he was ordered to pay in 2008.
Arthur Gelembiuk, of Cedars, Montgomery County, pleaded guilty in Bucks County court in 2012 to theft by deception after he took $24,180 in payments from a Wrightstown homeowner but failed to forward the payments to subcontractors hired to construct an in-ground pool. He was sentenced to three years of probation and ordered to pay $24,100 restitution, which he did, according to court records.
Gelembiuk, who was doing business as Platinum Outdoor Living in Cedars, was retained in 2010 as project manager responsible for providing construction drawings, site visits and supply licensed and insurance subcontractors for the pool project. He requested that all the subcontractors be paid through his company. Platinum Outdoor Living and Gelembiuk were not registered as contractors.
Robert A. Wewer, of Warwick, pleaded guilty in Montgomery County to three counts of felony theft by deception in 2013 for bilking three Montgomery County property owners out of $73,000.
Wewer, who was not registered as a contractor, was sentenced to 10 years OF probation and ordered to repay $73,898. he still owes more than $72,000, according to court records. Whitpain police in Montgomery County learned about the fraud in 2011 when a property owner reported he paid him $22,000 in 2009 for work that wasn’t finished. During the investigation into that case, police found Lower Moreland and Cheltenham property owners who made similar fraud complaints.
Source: Calkins Media archives, Pennsylvania online court records


Does Pennsylvania home improvement law have cracks in its foundation?

Posted: Sunday, March 8, 2015

First of two parts

A two-story addition completed in four months — tops — is what was promised to Jeffrey Goldstein in 2009. Before long, though, he suspected that promise would be broken.
A couple of months into construction, subcontractors claimed they weren’t paid. And the contractor, John Succi, routinely arrived at the Richboro home without building materials and supplies, then asked Goldstein’s wife to buy them. Succi also kept asking for more than the $80,000 price in the contract the Goldsteins signed.
Still, Goldstein said he wasn’t worried at the time. He knew that months earlier, the Legislature had adopted the Pennsylvania Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, which was designed to regulate the home improvement and repair industry. After he found strong evidence that Succi had violated virtually every aspect of the new law, Goldstein figured prosecuting him would be easy.
“I felt completely protected,” he said. “I felt like it would be righted if I went to the authorities and told them what was going on.”
He was wrong.


As it turns out, enforcement of the 6-year-old law is lackluster and relies on contractors to provide accurate information, according to consumer advocates and others.
Jeffrey Goldstein
Even the trade group for the state’s home improvement industry calls the law’s enforcement lax, despite changes the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office, which administers the law, implemented last year to address complaints. Those changes include a new regulatory compliance unit, random checks of applications and devoting more resources to investigating complaints.
“There are really no teeth (in the law)," said Peter Gallagher, president of the Pennsylvania Builders Association, which represents 5,400 companies. “There is a number at the Attorney General’s Office that you can call and complain, and if you complain, they’ll put it on their list, but that doesn’t mean it (investigation) will get done in a timely fashion.”
In 2010, when Goldstein said he first complained to the Attorney General’s Office and the Bucks County Office of Consumer Protection, he was told other complaints would be necessary before they’d investigate Succi’s business.
Last year — four years after Goldstein first brought his fraud suspicions to authorities — Succi went on trial for home improvement fraud. A jury found the Lower Makefield resident guilty of bilking 14 customers out of $2.5 million over at least eight years, in the largest home improvement contractor fraud case in recent memory.
CHANGES AND LOOPHOLES
Among the biggest complaints about the contractor law is its reliance on the honor system.
Contractors who perform at least $5,000 worth of home improvements a year are required by law to register their name, insurance coverage and other information with the Attorney General’s Office. But the information supplied, including records of prior bankruptcy filings, criminal convictions and civil judgments, isn't routinely checked for accuracy, according to the AG's Office.
“There was no way to verify the information early on, when registration first started,” said Bucks County assistant district attorney A.J. Garabedian, who prosecuted Succi.
That's still true, according to consumers and consumer advocates. As a result, circumventing the law is as simple as lying on an application, something Succi did repeatedly, authorities say. Contractors caught lying on their registrations — or failing to register — can face fines of up to $1,000 to $3,000 per violation, but no criminal penalties.
Registrations must be renewed every two years, but contractors frequently don't do so, Gallagher said.
“From a contractor’s standpoint, no one is concerned about registering. We’d really like to see the enforcement," he added. "I’m in the Poconos and had a few scandals up here and it was primarily three or four builders who put a black eye on every builder in the place. As a builder, you live and die by your reputation.”
Gallagher believes the lack of compliance is reflected in the numbers. After the law took effect, as many as 86,000 contractors were on the registry, he said. Now 67,000 are registered, including 10,165 and 2,377 in Bucks and Montgomery counties, respectively.
Other weaknesses in the law cited by consumer advocates and others:
John Succi

John Succi 
• Anyone with $51, a Social Security number and proof of at least $50,000 of insurance coverage can register as a contractor in Pennsylvania, according to contractors. No experience, education or training is required.
• The Attorney General’s Office can deactivate a registration if it contains inaccurate information, but a contractor can have it reinstated once the correct information is submitted.
• Prior criminal convictions alone, including home improvement-related crimes, won’t keep someone off the registry without a court order. And a court-barred contractor can petition to be reinstated five years after being taken off the list, according to the AG’s office.
“That is really what it comes down to — there is nothing to this law,” said Chester County kitchen and bath contractor George W. Edwards, a member of the National Association of the Remodeling Industry.
Since 2009, at least two Bucks County contractors with criminal theft and fraud convictions continued working in home repairs and construction with valid state registrations until they were arrested a second time on home improvement fraud charges.
One of those convicted contractors — John Salvatico, of Doylestown — was able to continue working in the construction field despite a court-ordered ban after his first 2008 conviction. His business — Eastern Construction & Roofing LLC — was registered under his wife’s name. Salvatico also used phony names when dealing with potential customers and local building and licensing officials.
When Goldstein, who now lives in Warminster, started digging into Succi’s background in 2010, he found prior successful civil suits and bankruptcy filings that the contractor had failed to disclose on his state registration. He also tracked down other people who claimed they were ripped off by Succi.
But it took three years before Bucks County detectives started to investigate Succi, who was then charged with 27 counts of felony fraud in February 2014. Succi remained a registered contractor until the AG's Office took him off the list a month before he was arrested.
Such loopholes are the reason Robin McNaughton believes her elderly parents were victimized by Bristol Township father-and-son contractors.
Her parents are among 10 property owners — many older adults — who allegedly were swindled out of $771,165 by Ryan and John “Jack” Thayer Jr. between March 2011 and April. The pair’s trial is expected to start Monday in Bucks County Court in Doylestown.
Ryan Thayer and John Thayer Jr.
Ryan (Left) and John Thayer Jr.
McNaughton alleges her parents paid the Thayers, of Hammertime Construction, $60,167 of the $157,531 cost to rebuild their fire-damaged home in 2013. They were promised the work would be finished in October of that year, according to McNaughton, who said the Thayers walked off the job in August. The family hired another contractor and spent $35,000 to get the job finished last year, she said.
“This licensing is a joke,” McNaughton added. “They are so good at preying on people in the most vulnerable situation. They’re like vultures coming down for the prey. It gives contractors a bad name.”
RED FLAGS MISSED
Before hiring Charles R. Gorman Custom Carpentry, of Horsham, to renovate a room in his Warminster home in 2013, George Coleman confirmed that Gordon's company was on the state’s Home Improvement Contractor Registry.
Charles Gorman
Charles Gorman
Coleman also noticed Gorman had answered “yes” to a registry question asking if he'd been sued in the last decade for home improvement work. Gorman told him it involved a $250 disagreement, Coleman said.
What Gorman didn’t reveal was that he had been successfully sued four times between 2007 and 2010, with judgments against him totaling $10,237, according to online court records.
Since 2012, Gorman has been successfully sued six more times, racking up another $31,394 in judgments, court records show. Among the more recent awards is one for $4,718 for Coleman, who said he has yet to see a penny of restitution.
“This is better than robbing a 7-Eleven,” Coleman said. “When you rob a 7-Eleven, you know you go to jail. When you’re a contractor, it’s 50-50 if it’s going to be considered a contractor’s dispute or outright theft.”
Consumer advocates believe customers, such as Goldstein and Coleman, might believe that contractors who appear on the state registry have been vetted even though they're not. Even the AG’s website, where individuals can check a registration status, warns consumers that just because a contractor’s name appears on the registry, that shouldn't be interpreted as an endorsement of workmanship or honesty. The website also encourages individuals to do further background checks.
Of the nearly two dozen contractors accused or convicted of home improvement-related crimes in Bucks and Montgomery counties since 2009, a little more than half were registered, as required, including Succi, Gorman and the Thayers.
Succi first registered JS Contractors and Builders Inc. with the state, but he lied about his insurance coverage, as well as providing a false birth date, according to authorities. When his registration expired in 2011 and again in 2013, he renewed it under a different birth date and listed himself as the company’s vice president, according to state records.
Consumer advocates emphasize that one of the main purposes for establishing the state registry was to get contractors to carry insurance and to make it easier for authorities to find them if complaints were filed.
Before the 2009 law, each municipality issued home improvement contractor licenses and there was no easy way to find out if a license had been revoked, Bucks County Consumer Protection Director Michael Bannon said. As a result, a contractor banned in one town could change his company’s name and set up shop elsewhere virtually undetected.
What brought the issue to the breaking point in Pennsylvania was New Jersey's adoption of stricter contractors law in 2005, Bannon said. When that went into effect, unscrupulous contractors began to cross the Delaware and set up shop in Pennsylvania. Complaints spiked as a result, he said.
“We didn’t know who anyone was,” Bannon said. “I do believe what was passed in 2009 may not be perfect, but it has helped us track down some of the really bad offenders.”
Since 2009, at least 17 contractors have been convicted of home improvement-related crimes in Bucks and Montgomery counties, and at least four others are accused or awaiting trial.
Upper Southampton police arrested Gorman in July, alleging that he accepted more than $36,000 over three years and performed shoddy or incomplete work, according to a probable cause affidavit. He recently pleaded guilty in county court to felony home improvement fraud-related charges involving 10 property owners — including Coleman.
Succi was recently sentenced to 15 to 30 years in state prison, the longest prison sentence for a convicted home improvement contractor in recent memory.
But there's no guarantee that convicted contractors will get prison time.
A review of court records showed that half of the 10 contractors convicted and sentenced in Bucks County for home improvement-related crimes since 2009 were not sentenced to prison.
Steven Dunner, of Doylestown Roofing and Siding, was sentenced to two years of probation in 2011 after pleading guilty to contractor-related theft. Less than a year later, he was arrested a second time, for taking $28,000 from three Bucks County homeowners and then stopping work after he cashed the checks.
That's when authorities realized Dunner had lied on his registration application about his previous conviction. After pleading guilty the second time, Dunner was sentenced to two to 10 years in state prison. He appealed and lost, but disappeared while he was free on unsecured bail.
Steve Dunner
Steven Dunner
While the law has made it easier to find alleged crooked contractors and provided more tools for prosecuting them, it can still be challenging, according to Marc Furber, chief of economic crimes for the Bucks County District Attorney’s Office.
Cases in which a contractor allegedly accepts a deposit and fails to perform work are easier to prove, but once work starts, it can be harder to prove criminal intent — a necessary factor, Furber said.
“Is it a bad businessman or someone who specifically went in there to defraud?” Furber said. “That is always one of the things we face.”
Investigating alleged contractor fraud is a long, tedious exercise that requires showing a pattern of behavior, Bannon explained.
“Fraud is hard to prove. You have to prove their intent was to steal from the beginning of the job,” Bannon added. “When you get someone who knows how to play the system, it complicates things.”
Pennsylvania Attorney General spokeswoman Carolyn Myers said multiple complaints greatly assist the investigation into contractors who are accused of ripping off clients by not performing or finishing contracted-for work or by doing shoddy work.
And a distinct line exists between civil and criminal breach of contract, Upper Southampton Detective James Schirmer said. A contractor who does poor quality work is a civil case, but one who takes money and performs no work is more likely a criminal case. Schirmer added that he believes the contractor law is sufficient, as long as people are vigilant and educated about it.
“No matter how tight the law is,” he added, “there will always be someone willing to find a weakness."
Jo Ciavaglia: 215-949-4181; email: jciavaglia@calkins.com; Twitter: @jociavaglia

What the Pennsylvania Home Improvement Law says:

Plea deal may be sought for Parx jockey charged with burglary, assault, etc.





Posted: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 
With a pink shirt hiding his colostomy bag, a pair of blue jeans, a buzz cut and braces on his teeth, Angel Suarez Medero looked more like a high school freshman than a man who allegedly went on what officials said was a half-naked rampage they suspect was fueled by drugs.
The 21-year-old Medero, a promising jockey at Parx Racing in Bensalem, is headed to trial in Bucks County Court after police say he broke into two apartments in the Bensalem complex where he lives, assaulted two people and stole a dog before he was shot twice by another man a few days after Christmas.
Exactly why a man his defense attorney described as “117 pounds of sweetness” ended up in this position remains a mystery, though both the defense and prosecution believe the marijuana that Medero allegedly smoked beforehand is a factor.
Angel Medero
Toxicology and lab tests are pending on Medero and the marijuana found in his apartment, prosecutor Dan Sweeney said, adding that it appears the marijuana was a “very virulent” variety.
“We don’t really have a good reason why it happened,” Medero’s attorney, William Goldman Jr. said, after his client waived his right to a preliminary hearing Wednesday on charges including burglary, simple assault and indecent exposure. “We’re scratching our heads to figure out why. This is all atypical for Angel.”
Medero, who is free after posting 10 percent of his $250,000 bail, doesn’t remember the Dec. 28 incident, Goldman said. He added that his client wanted him to publicly apologize for his behavior.
Bensalem police believe Medero was in a marijuana-induced haze when a woman saw him masturbating on the second-floor balcony of her apartment in the Franklin Commons complex where he and his girlfriend lived. As the woman ran out of her apartment to call police, she heard glass breaking and the man who was later identified as Medero running around her apartment, police said.
When police arrived, they found the rear sliding glass door and rear bedroom window of the apartment broken and living room furniture overturned. Police later learned that Medero threw a lawn chair through the sliding glass door and entered the apartment. They found fresh blood on the kitchen floor, bathroom door jamb and closet door.
While investigating the call, officers received a report that a man had been shot and was being detained at another apartment in the same building.
When police investigated, a couple in the second apartment said they were watching TV when they heard a banging from outdoors, court documents said. The wife opened the sliding glass door to investigate while the husband retrieved his .45-caliber gun. The husband walked into the rear yard, where he saw Medero dive out of a second-floor window of the first apartment, police said.
Medero, who was wearing a white T-shirt and nothing else, had a long-haired dachshund in his arms when he jumped, the husband told police. Ollie the dog, which belonged to the woman in the first apartment, was missing for two weeks before he was found and returned to his owner.
After he landed, Medero headed toward the husband, waving his arms and talking “gibberish,” the affidavit said. Medero got into the husband’s apartment and grabbed the wife, police said. The husband said he warned Medero twice that he had a gun.
The husband fired the gun twice when Medero was running at him and wouldn’t stop, hitting him in the stomach area, court documents said. When the bullets failed to stop Medero, police said the husband grabbed him and put him a headlock while his wife called 911. The resident doesn’t face any criminal charges in the shooting, according to the Bucks County District Attorney’s Office.
Medero struggled with police when they attempted to take him into custody and it took three officers to handcuff him, according to police.
In the subsequent investigation, Medero’s girlfriend, who’s also a jockey, said Medero had smoked marijuana before the incident, according to a probable cause affidavit. After the two argued, the girlfriend said Medero went into the bathroom and was “acting off” when he came out, according to the affidavit.
When her son left the bathroom, Medero’s mother said he appeared to be having a “mental episode” similar to one he experienced after smoking marijuana when they lived in Puerto Rico, court documents said.
The shooting left Medero with liver and pancreas injuries. He uses a colostomy bag and more surgeries are scheduled, Goldman said. A second-place finisher in the prestigious Eclipse Award for the top apprentice jockey in 2012, Medero’s future in the sport is uncertain, his attorney added.
After the brief court appearance, Goldman said he’s awaiting a medical review and lab analysis results before he sits down with Sweeney to attempt to work out a negotiated guilty plea.
“It’s an extremely strange case. We are all at a loss to understand why and how this happened,” Goldman said. “Perhaps the best message to the community is don’t smoke marijuana — you don’t know what it might be laced with.”